Robbo,
That's max beam - the widest point. It doesn't say anything about the fineness or cross-sectional shape of the boat.
Fineness is a measure of how soon a boat gets wide and how long it stays wide when you're moving from front to back. All other things being equal, a finer boat has less rolling stability.
The cross-sectional shapeis also very important. All other things being equal, flatter bottoms are initially more stable but get less stable the more they heel (lean over). V-bottom boats start out less stable, but the more they heel, the more stable they get. The speed of the transition between stable and unstable also depends on whether the cross section is rounded or chined (hard corners).
So comparing the Shearwater 14 to the Chesapeake 14, we see that the SW14 is finer than the CH14. It comes to a sharp point at both ends and narrows faster in the rear than the CH14. The CH14 also gets wider in the front sooner than the SW14.
The result of all this is that the CH14 has a greater average beam than the SW14. All other things being equal, it'll be more stable. Unfortunately, the line drawings don't show the cross sections so it's impossible to analyze that from the public data.
As far asnot weighing enough to get the boat down to the designed water line, it's the simplest thing in the world to add ballast. Just make it removeable so you can still easily carry the boat.
Have fun,
Laszlo
PS - Does anyone else find this sentence from the SW ad copy odd?
"Like all Chesapeake Light Craft kayak kits, the decks are smoothly cambered, not cut up into a faceted, homebuilt appearance"
I mean, by definition all these boats have a homebuilt appearance. That's CLC's business - boats built at home. Also, the tumblehome panels are in fact curved facets. Very nice looking curved facets that give the boat a sculptural look, but facets just the same.
Sigh, Here I am grading ad copy writing. Can you guys tell that I really don't want to go out to the shop and sand my dinghy?